Petition for saving CIFEJ

#8: Democracy -

I am not sure that you ask me but I will answer.

I am so sorry to have to tell you that all you are writing is not true:

1. nobody boycott Warsaw, this town, of course!

2. members in the Boycott not ruin efort of CIFEJ! after lot of communication with HQ and part of the Board it was clear that present presidency don't like to communicate with one group of the members. It is reazon to boycott, NO OTHER TOOLS and boycott is peacfull, nonviolent, passive and democratic tool for people like to express that they are not agreed. If Mohsen has capacity and support of majority of the Board and Members, if possible meeting in Warsaw could aprove that it was legal, legitime and acording the statutes meeting HQ have not reason to take care about our group in protest.

3. nobody chosen Belgrade in advance! it is other proposal (Paris for example) and I, personaly, support nomination of Paris. This is ONLY temporary HQ (like we had in Johannesburg, if you remember). First legal GA have to decide about all elements of the future of CIFEJ but with supervisors from UN, UNESCO and UNICEF and based on the last legal Statutes we have (from Tehran 2005).

So, your three why it was wrong and if you have opportunity to see proposed changing of the CIFEJ Statutes you will see immediately why me and some other members of CIFEJ are in Boycott.

Hope that all people wiling beter future of CIFEJ will understand that the best solution is to cancell meeting in Warsaw and to back on the CIFEJ table!

In the future possible communication please use your name because it is my last answer to anonimus comments (this non-transparency is one of the main reason for boycott, if you understand).

Best regards, Miomir