Hands Off Hartlebury Common
Contact the author of the petition
Re: Re: INCIDENT NUMBER1
#1501: Carol stockton - Re: INCIDENT NUMBER1
That is the exact reason why they should not be loose on the common where the public have the right to work.
I AM NOT A STUPID COW. IT DOES NOT COST NOTHING TO BE POLITE.
Re: Re: INCIDENT NUMBER1
#1501: Carol stockton - Re: INCIDENT NUMBER1
"Course they will spook they're live animals. Like dogs can attack but most don't. Stupid cow."
You really have to try much harder than this.
"Like dogs can attack, but most don't. Just like cattle"
I completley agree with you but calling somebody else stupid beggars belief this time 10/10
Unlike the other site this one has a wide following, highly entertaining stuff from the pro lobby, and more support for us
Having talked to Carol, she is neither stupid or a cow, get your facts right before you spout this stuff.
This comment has been removed by the author of the petition.
Reason for the removal: rule98
Re: Re: Re: INCIDENT NUMBER1
#1502: CAROL - Re: Re: INCIDENT NUMBER1
HEY CAROL, DON'T ANSWER THEIR STUPID RHETORIC, LEAVE THEM TOO STEW
TONY BARNETT
This comment has been removed by the author of the petition.
Reason for the removal: rule98
This comment has been removed by the person who wrote it.
Reason for the removal: bet the post above is removed so;
'LET THEM STEW IN THEIR OWN FRUSTRATION', 'LEAVE THEM TOO STEW', 'Unlike the other site this one has a wide following', 'highly entertaining stuff from the pro lobby'.
Why on earth would anyone be frustrated. The common's owned by the council as proven by paperwork and registration with the Land Registry. The common's an urban common so riders can take their horses on it. The correct lines have been taken and legal permission has been given for the work there. A much smaller amount of trees than first though have been removed or will be over a LONG time not all together. The public can access the common all over the place. The cattle are there grazing. Hopefully it wll all work.
If that's all highly entertaining stuff then fine.
There isnt another site to compare anything to is there, you saw to that with your stupid games and everythings better in one place anyway isnt it?
Re:
THERE MAY NOT ANOTHER SITE TO COMPARE WITH, BUT THERE IS SOMEONE YOU MIGHT LIKE TO CHALLENGE ON WHAT YOU THINK YOU KNOW AND WHAT IS FACT, I WOULD EVEN BE PREPARED TO CHALLENGE YOU ON YOUR KNOWLEDGE OF HARTLEBURY, CONVEYANCE, YOUR DOCUMENTS AND EXPERTISE ON HORTICULTURE.
YOU NAME THE TIME AND PLACE AND I WILL ACCOMMADATE YOU
TONY BARNETT
Re:
"Why on earth would anyone be frustrated. The common's owned by the council as proven by paperwork and registration with the Land Registry. INCORRECT
The common's an urban common so riders can take their horses on it. RURAL COMMON
The correct lines have been taken INCORRECT
legal permission has been given for the work there. ILLEGAL PERMISSION
A much smaller amount of trees than first though have been removed or will be over a LONG time not all together. NO TREES SHOULD BE FELLED
The public can access the common all over the place. THE DISABLED CAN'T, NIETHER CAN ABLE BODIED PEOPLE
The cattle are there grazing. Hopefully it wll all work. IT WONT AND THE DAMAGE WILL NOT BE REPAIRABLE
If that's all highly entertaining stuff then fine. THE OTHER POST WAS ENTERTAINING YOURS IS BORING
There isnt another site to compare anything to is there, you saw to that with your stupid games and everythings better in one place anyway isnt it?" START YOUR OWN SITE?
Why do you keep coming back if we are so irrelevant?
This comment has been removed by the author of the petition.
Reason for the removal: rule98
This comment has been removed by the person who wrote it.
Reason for the removal: As before the above post will be removed.
"Why on earth would anyone be frustrated. The common's owned by the council as proven by paperwork and registration with the Land Registry. INCORRECT
A) Why 'incorrect'? It's there in black and white. Are you saying that the registration doesn't exist then, surely youve got a copy. Havent you?
The common's an urban common so riders can take their horses on it. RURAL COMMON
A) No, urban. Look back at how the area was organised. Check your council and boundry alterations and youll see that Stourport was classed as urban and had an urban district council.
The correct lines have been taken INCORRECT
A) The correct lines have been taken. They wouldnt have got as far as they could via the correct methods otherwise.
legal permission has been given for the work there. ILLEGAL PERMISSION
A) All legal and above board. As before, surely youve got the paperwork?
A much smaller amount of trees than first though have been removed or will be over a LONG time not all together. NO TREES SHOULD BE FELLED
A) If no trees (saplings, scrub, whatever) are removed then itll end up woodland. The main areas or woodland wil be fine, the central areas will be kept open or opened up to protect or preserve the heathland. Over time.
The public can access the common all over the place. THE DISABLED CAN'T, NIETHER CAN ABLE BODIED PEOPLE
A) We can access the common from all over the place in all the places we normally access the common whatever our ability.
The cattle are there grazing. Hopefully it wll all work. IT WONT AND THE DAMAGE WILL NOT BE REPAIRABLE
A) It might, it might not. We wont see until some time passes will we. Of course it will be repairable if it doesnt work youve already said that the area will repair itself, that nature does that.
If that's all highly entertaining stuff then fine. THE OTHER POST WAS ENTERTAINING YOURS IS BORING
A) You find it 'boring' because it goes against what you say.
There isnt another site to compare anything to is there, you saw to that with your stupid games and everythings better in one place anyway isnt it?" START YOUR OWN SITE?
A) I dont want to start my own site so stuff may as well go on here hadnt it.
Why do you keep coming back if we are so irrelevant?
Did I say you were irrelevant? I dont think I put that?
Yawn
Just because you talk polite does not make it right.
This site IS one sided, the clue is in the title of it. I have spent the last two months faithfully trying to answer questions but when you find yourself replying to the same person, with the same question and having to answer them as before, over and over again, there has to be a cut off point. We will never agree because we do not share the same philosophy and never will. The public share my point of view, not yours.
We have covered so many topics so many times and enough is enough. I am not stupid, I can see the difference between valid objection, spiteful playacting, and dishonest representation.
You had your chance with the other site but you couldnt make it stick. This site is a place for people with an objection to the work at the common or people who sincerely want more information.
I will delete what I want and if you do not like it, you know what you can do.
"Like dogs can attack, but most don't. Just like cattle"
A Guest
This comment has been removed by the person who wrote it.
Reason for the removal: I'm not frustrated. I'm happy to see the cattle. I'm not the person who posted politely either. Im the one who called carol a stupid cow as I think she's fickle. The facts are you objected to the work and wcc have carried on regardless of your pathetic campaign. That's my proof of ownership. They listened to you realised what a clown you were and carried on. End of. You make me laugh with the comments. You can do nothing about it.
flotsam
"Reason for removal: I'm not frustrated. I'm happy to see the cattle. I'm not the person who posted politely either.
Who knows who you are?
Im the one who called carol a stupid cow as I think she's fickle.
Do you call that a measured response?
The facts are you objected to the work and wcc have carried on regardless of your pathetic campaign.
Quite a good campaign actually
That's my proof of ownership.
Glad its good enough for you, they will take your garden next then.
They listened to you realised what a clown you were and carried on.
Who HAVE they listened to?
End of.
You make me laugh with the comments. You can do nothing about it."
Cannott stop you laughing, have you been to a doctor
This comment has been removed by the author of the petition.
Reason for the removal: rule68
Re: Re: flotsam
WHAT A GOOD IDEA, CAN WE THEN START WITH THE MR GUEST THAT HAS ALL OF THE EVIDENCE TO SHOW WCC HAVE GOOD TITLE, WHERE AND WHEN ARE YOU GOING TO DISCLOSE, I THINK IT ONLY FAIR THAT IF HE CANNOT ANSWER OR DISLCOSE SHOULD HE NOT KEEP SILENT UNTIL HE CAN?
TONY BARNETT
Re: Re: flotsam
Been tried before I'm afraid, ok up to a point, like when somebody is prepared to pick up the phone 01299 251 497 and discuss, otherwise it is a pointless comments tennis.
Generally there is enough information around for people to make their minds up. A lot of the public were aware of our concerns and really we are just representing them. I will give any amount of time to genuine face to face discussion but for the questions that have just posted about, ownership, rights, erosion etc, these have been dealt with time and time again and are addressed on the petition front page.
This comment has been removed by the person who wrote it.
Reason for the removal: Barnett you'll be dead soon. You old twat. Mccarron your a waste of space. Cant even keep your own business running so how can you represent the people of hartlebury???
RE; BARNETT YOU WILL BE DEAD SOON YOU OLD TWAT., ALTHOUGH REMOVED BY THE WRITER, THIS STILL SHOWS HOW UNEDUCATED THIS FARMER IS, AND NO THREAT IS TO OUT LANDISH FOR HIM TO MAKE.
LET ME RESPOND TO THE WELL WISHER, THERE WAS A GOOD NUMBER OF IGNORANT PEOPLE LIKE YOU THAT NEVER HAD THEIR WISHES COME TO FRUITION, I BELIEVE IN NATURAL EVOLUTION/PHENOMENA, MY TIME WILL COME NO DOUBT ABOUT THAT, BUT THERE ARE OTHER PEOPLE THAT WILL CONTINUE,SO WHAT DO YOU WISH FOR NOW,TOTAL CLEANSING?
TONY BARNETT
Twat?
Reason for removal:
"Barnett you'll be dead soon." Mr Guest, are you an astrologer or a hit man?
"You old ?" Well done Mr guest, Mr Barnett is of senior years.
"twat" Is that a sound effect from the old Batman series on telly
"Mccarron your a waste of space." I have managed to take your time up, so I have achieved at least one good thing, and anyway, lots of people disagree with you Mr Guest which is why our campaign is financially supported by members of the public.
"Cant even keep your own business running" Which business, is it your business or mine, do you know?
"so how can you represent the people of hartlebury???" I can't tell you it's a secret, but if your very good and sign my petetion I can coach you on how to communicate with people.
"Course they will spook they're live animals. Like dogs can attack but most don't. Stupid cow." This is definatley not the way to do it, naughty Mr Guest, stand at the back of the class!
common values
Re:
your rights to have the cattle removed are still intact, so why not demand WCC have the cattle removed?
tony
Re:
Very odd, a copy and paste of a post (#353) from June 29th 01:33
No new users on this site then?
This comment has been removed by the person who wrote it.
Reason for the removal: And because the comment above will be deleted
re post #1522
Very odd, a copy and paste of a post (#353) from June 29th 01:33
No new users on this site then?
| This discussion has been closed. |
This comment has been removed by the author of the petition.
Reason for the removal: rule98