PetitionOnline.ie
Browse Petitions Search Contact the petition author Contact Us Languages Manage your signatures Confirm your signature with a code Log in
Start a Petition

Report a petition

Stop the Bengeo Quarry

Petitions express opinions. Disagreeing with a petition, or thinking it is pointless, is not grounds for a report, and such reports are closed automatically. Report a petition only if it breaks the law or our Community Guidelines, for example hate speech, defamation of a person or organisation, publishing private information, or fraud. We do not check whether the claims in a petition are true; the author is responsible for them.

This report goes to the people who run this website, not to the petition author or to any authority. If you have a question or feedback for the author, send them a message.

Why are you reporting this?
What is wrong with the name?
Please tell us in the text field below what makes you think so.

Petitions express opinions. Disagreeing with a petition, or thinking it is pointless, is not grounds for a report, and we do not remove petitions because people oppose them.

If you send this, your disagreement is recorded and the report is closed automatically with no action; the decision is sent to your email address. If the content breaks the law or our Community Guidelines, choose that option above instead.

You can also start your own petition or contact the author.

Is the false claim about you, your organisation, or another identifiable person or organisation?

Which passage is false? You can click several sentences in the petition text, and tell us for each what is true. This is optional.

Sentences next to each other are joined into one claim. Click a sentence again to remove it.

Stop the Bengeo Quarry

TO: Hertfordshire County Council

Ref- PL\0776\16

We, the signatories of this petition, strongly object to the proposed development of an open quarry in the fields between Sacombe Road, Wadesmill Road (B158), and Chapmore End forrest and urge you not to degrade our health, environment and countryside by approving the planning application.

The proposed phased extraction of sand and gravel, mobile dry screening plant, stockpile area, weighbridge, wheel cleaning facilities, ancillary site offices, construction of a new access onto Wadesmill Road with phased restoration to landscaped farmland at a lower level at Land at Ware Park, Wadesmill Road, Hertford is entirely unsuitable and should be rejected.

The closest residents will be an estimated 30m away from the proposed site boundary. Bengeo Primary school is approximately 400m from the proposed site boundary.

We, as signed signaturies, believe the proposed gravel, sand and mineral extractions will have a profound negative impact on the local community, environment and wildlife. We are concerned about the possible direct health effects of extraction works. We believe that the noise, dust and air pollution will be a nuisance, and almost certainly unavoidable. We strongly reject any suggestion that there has been any consideration for the impact that Lorry movements will have on our local roads and infrastructure.

Having studied the plans we believe that the sites of gravel extraction is very close to the Wadesmill Rd borehole. We strongly believe that extracting 2.6million tonnes of sand and gravel so close to the Wadesmill borehole will have a negative impact onthe Aquifer and would urge HCC to carry our an independent environmental assessment and hydrogeology study. We do not believe that the proposed application submitted by RJD Limited and Gowling WLG Trust Corporation Limited meets the criteria of MLPR preferred area 2 as it proposes the creation of an entirely new quarry and disregards the relevant Access, Specific Considerations, boundary and buffer zone requirements as stated in the MLPR.

We do not believe that a viable extraction process can take place and strongly object to the proposal.

We do not check whether the claims in a petition are true; the author is responsible for them. If you send this, it is recorded and the report is closed automatically with no action; the decision is sent to your email address.

You can start your own petition with the information you believe is correct, or contact the author.

A false claim about an identifiable person or organisation is defamation, and we do act on that.

Continue: report defamation

Who is the content about?
Is the person the content is about a politician, a decision-maker or another public figure?
What does the content criticise?

Public criticism of how a politician or decision-maker acts in a public role is allowed, also when the events are old. That a matter is old is not in itself a ground for removal. We can still act on a false claim about the person or on otherwise unlawful content.

If the matter is old or no longer current, it is best to contact the petition author directly. The author can remove the petition for any reason; we cannot.

Is the person the content is about a politician, a decision-maker or another public figure?
What does the content criticise?

Public criticism of how a politician or decision-maker acts in a public role is allowed, also when the events are old. That a matter is old is not in itself a ground for removal. We can still act on a false claim about the person or on otherwise unlawful content.

If the matter is old or no longer current, it is best to contact the petition author directly. The author can remove the petition for any reason; we cannot.

We do not check whether the claims in a petition are true; the author is responsible for them. We act on a false claim when it concerns an identifiable person or organisation. If you simply disagree with the claim, you can start your own petition or contact the author.

Click the false sentences in the petition text.

Which passage exactly is hate speech? Click the sentences in the petition text.

Which passage exactly calls for violence? Click the sentences in the petition text.

Which passage exactly glorifies or incites terrorism? Click the sentences in the petition text.

Which passage exactly harasses or bullies someone? Click the sentences in the petition text.

Which passage exactly reveals private information? Click the sentences in the petition text.

Which passage exactly accuses someone of a crime? Click the sentences in the petition text.

Which passage exactly calls for the death penalty or torture? Click the sentences in the petition text.

Sentences next to each other are joined into one claim. Click a sentence again to remove it.

Stop the Bengeo Quarry

TO: Hertfordshire County Council

Ref- PL\0776\16

We, the signatories of this petition, strongly object to the proposed development of an open quarry in the fields between Sacombe Road, Wadesmill Road (B158), and Chapmore End forrest and urge you not to degrade our health, environment and countryside by approving the planning application.

The proposed phased extraction of sand and gravel, mobile dry screening plant, stockpile area, weighbridge, wheel cleaning facilities, ancillary site offices, construction of a new access onto Wadesmill Road with phased restoration to landscaped farmland at a lower level at Land at Ware Park, Wadesmill Road, Hertford is entirely unsuitable and should be rejected.

The closest residents will be an estimated 30m away from the proposed site boundary. Bengeo Primary school is approximately 400m from the proposed site boundary.

We, as signed signaturies, believe the proposed gravel, sand and mineral extractions will have a profound negative impact on the local community, environment and wildlife. We are concerned about the possible direct health effects of extraction works. We believe that the noise, dust and air pollution will be a nuisance, and almost certainly unavoidable. We strongly reject any suggestion that there has been any consideration for the impact that Lorry movements will have on our local roads and infrastructure.

Having studied the plans we believe that the sites of gravel extraction is very close to the Wadesmill Rd borehole. We strongly believe that extracting 2.6million tonnes of sand and gravel so close to the Wadesmill borehole will have a negative impact onthe Aquifer and would urge HCC to carry our an independent environmental assessment and hydrogeology study. We do not believe that the proposed application submitted by RJD Limited and Gowling WLG Trust Corporation Limited meets the criteria of MLPR preferred area 2 as it proposes the creation of an entirely new quarry and disregards the relevant Access, Specific Considerations, boundary and buffer zone requirements as stated in the MLPR.

We do not believe that a viable extraction process can take place and strongly object to the proposal.

Click the false sentences in the petition text.

Which passage exactly is hate speech? Click the sentences in the petition text.

Which passage exactly reveals private information? Click the sentences in the petition text.

Which passage exactly is terrorist or extremist content? Click the sentences in the petition text.

Sentences next to each other are joined into one claim. Click a sentence again to remove it.

Stop the Bengeo Quarry

TO: Hertfordshire County Council

Ref- PL\0776\16

We, the signatories of this petition, strongly object to the proposed development of an open quarry in the fields between Sacombe Road, Wadesmill Road (B158), and Chapmore End forrest and urge you not to degrade our health, environment and countryside by approving the planning application.

The proposed phased extraction of sand and gravel, mobile dry screening plant, stockpile area, weighbridge, wheel cleaning facilities, ancillary site offices, construction of a new access onto Wadesmill Road with phased restoration to landscaped farmland at a lower level at Land at Ware Park, Wadesmill Road, Hertford is entirely unsuitable and should be rejected.

The closest residents will be an estimated 30m away from the proposed site boundary. Bengeo Primary school is approximately 400m from the proposed site boundary.

We, as signed signaturies, believe the proposed gravel, sand and mineral extractions will have a profound negative impact on the local community, environment and wildlife. We are concerned about the possible direct health effects of extraction works. We believe that the noise, dust and air pollution will be a nuisance, and almost certainly unavoidable. We strongly reject any suggestion that there has been any consideration for the impact that Lorry movements will have on our local roads and infrastructure.

Having studied the plans we believe that the sites of gravel extraction is very close to the Wadesmill Rd borehole. We strongly believe that extracting 2.6million tonnes of sand and gravel so close to the Wadesmill borehole will have a negative impact onthe Aquifer and would urge HCC to carry our an independent environmental assessment and hydrogeology study. We do not believe that the proposed application submitted by RJD Limited and Gowling WLG Trust Corporation Limited meets the criteria of MLPR preferred area 2 as it proposes the creation of an entirely new quarry and disregards the relevant Access, Specific Considerations, boundary and buffer zone requirements as stated in the MLPR.

We do not believe that a viable extraction process can take place and strongly object to the proposal.

We use this to acknowledge your report and to tell you the outcome.
I am reporting
What are you asking for? You can choose more than one.
May we forward your request to the petition author? The author can remove the petition for any reason, and may respond to the request sooner than our moderators.
May we forward your request to the petition author? The author can remove the petition for any reason, and may respond to the request sooner than our moderators.
May we forward your request to the petition author? The author can remove the petition for any reason, and may respond to the request sooner than our moderators.

Reported petitions are reviewed by our team to determine if they violate our Terms of Service or Community Guidelines.