PetitionOnline.ie
Browse Petitions Search Contact the petition author Contact Us Languages Manage your signatures Confirm your signature with a code Log in
Start a Petition

Report a petition

WIPO: Give Creators More Ways to Stand Behind Their Work

Petitions express opinions. Disagreeing with a petition, or thinking it is pointless, is not grounds for a report, and such reports are closed automatically. Report a petition only if it breaks the law or our Community Guidelines, for example hate speech, defamation of a person or organisation, publishing private information, or fraud. We do not check whether the claims in a petition are true; the author is responsible for them.

This report goes to the people who run this website, not to the petition author or to any authority. If you have a question or feedback for the author, send them a message.

Why are you reporting this?
What is wrong with the name?
Please tell us in the text field below what makes you think so.

Petitions express opinions. Disagreeing with a petition, or thinking it is pointless, is not grounds for a report, and we do not remove petitions because people oppose them.

If you send this, your disagreement is recorded and the report is closed automatically with no action; the decision is sent to your email address. If the content breaks the law or our Community Guidelines, choose that option above instead.

You can also start your own petition or contact the author.

Is the false claim about you, your organisation, or another identifiable person or organisation?

Which passage is false? You can click several sentences in the petition text, and tell us for each what is true. This is optional.

Sentences next to each other are joined into one claim. Click a sentence again to remove it.

WIPO: Give Creators More Ways to Stand Behind Their Work

We ask the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) to include digital timestamps and verifiable evidence records in its “Proof of creation” guidance.

Creators deserve more ways to document their work, support their ownership claims, and defend their rights. If WIPO lists mailing a sealed copy of a work to yourself, it should recognize secure digital evidence too.

Digital evidence can help show when a work existed and preserve a creator’s statements about it in a form others can check.

As a creative community, we are ready to stand behind our claims, take responsibility for them, and have them examined when challenged.

Recognize the evidence. Empower the creator.

Proposed addition to WIPO’s “Proof of creation” guidance

Digital timestamps and verifiable evidence records

Digital timestamps and verifiable evidence records can help creators show when a work existed and preserve their statements about its creation and ownership. Creators remain responsible for their statements, which can be examined and challenged. These records can support a claim alongside other evidence; they do not establish authorship or ownership by themselves.

We do not check whether the claims in a petition are true; the author is responsible for them. If you send this, it is recorded and the report is closed automatically with no action; the decision is sent to your email address.

You can start your own petition with the information you believe is correct, or contact the author.

A false claim about an identifiable person or organisation is defamation, and we do act on that.

Continue: report defamation

Who is the content about?
Is the person the content is about a politician, a decision-maker or another public figure?
What does the content criticise?

Public criticism of how a politician or decision-maker acts in a public role is allowed, also when the events are old. That a matter is old is not in itself a ground for removal. We can still act on a false claim about the person or on otherwise unlawful content.

If the matter is old or no longer current, it is best to contact the petition author directly. The author can remove the petition for any reason; we cannot.

Is the person the content is about a politician, a decision-maker or another public figure?
What does the content criticise?

Public criticism of how a politician or decision-maker acts in a public role is allowed, also when the events are old. That a matter is old is not in itself a ground for removal. We can still act on a false claim about the person or on otherwise unlawful content.

If the matter is old or no longer current, it is best to contact the petition author directly. The author can remove the petition for any reason; we cannot.

We do not check whether the claims in a petition are true; the author is responsible for them. We act on a false claim when it concerns an identifiable person or organisation. If you simply disagree with the claim, you can start your own petition or contact the author.

Click the false sentences in the petition text.

Which passage exactly is hate speech? Click the sentences in the petition text.

Which passage exactly calls for violence? Click the sentences in the petition text.

Which passage exactly glorifies or incites terrorism? Click the sentences in the petition text.

Which passage exactly harasses or bullies someone? Click the sentences in the petition text.

Which passage exactly reveals private information? Click the sentences in the petition text.

Which passage exactly accuses someone of a crime? Click the sentences in the petition text.

Which passage exactly calls for the death penalty or torture? Click the sentences in the petition text.

Sentences next to each other are joined into one claim. Click a sentence again to remove it.

WIPO: Give Creators More Ways to Stand Behind Their Work

We ask the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) to include digital timestamps and verifiable evidence records in its “Proof of creation” guidance.

Creators deserve more ways to document their work, support their ownership claims, and defend their rights. If WIPO lists mailing a sealed copy of a work to yourself, it should recognize secure digital evidence too.

Digital evidence can help show when a work existed and preserve a creator’s statements about it in a form others can check.

As a creative community, we are ready to stand behind our claims, take responsibility for them, and have them examined when challenged.

Recognize the evidence. Empower the creator.

Proposed addition to WIPO’s “Proof of creation” guidance

Digital timestamps and verifiable evidence records

Digital timestamps and verifiable evidence records can help creators show when a work existed and preserve their statements about its creation and ownership. Creators remain responsible for their statements, which can be examined and challenged. These records can support a claim alongside other evidence; they do not establish authorship or ownership by themselves.

Click the false sentences in the petition text.

Which passage exactly is hate speech? Click the sentences in the petition text.

Which passage exactly reveals private information? Click the sentences in the petition text.

Which passage exactly is terrorist or extremist content? Click the sentences in the petition text.

Sentences next to each other are joined into one claim. Click a sentence again to remove it.

WIPO: Give Creators More Ways to Stand Behind Their Work

We ask the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) to include digital timestamps and verifiable evidence records in its “Proof of creation” guidance.

Creators deserve more ways to document their work, support their ownership claims, and defend their rights. If WIPO lists mailing a sealed copy of a work to yourself, it should recognize secure digital evidence too.

Digital evidence can help show when a work existed and preserve a creator’s statements about it in a form others can check.

As a creative community, we are ready to stand behind our claims, take responsibility for them, and have them examined when challenged.

Recognize the evidence. Empower the creator.

Proposed addition to WIPO’s “Proof of creation” guidance

Digital timestamps and verifiable evidence records

Digital timestamps and verifiable evidence records can help creators show when a work existed and preserve their statements about its creation and ownership. Creators remain responsible for their statements, which can be examined and challenged. These records can support a claim alongside other evidence; they do not establish authorship or ownership by themselves.

We use this to acknowledge your report and to tell you the outcome.
I am reporting
What are you asking for? You can choose more than one.
May we forward your request to the petition author? The author can remove the petition for any reason, and may respond to the request sooner than our moderators.
May we forward your request to the petition author? The author can remove the petition for any reason, and may respond to the request sooner than our moderators.
May we forward your request to the petition author? The author can remove the petition for any reason, and may respond to the request sooner than our moderators.

Reported petitions are reviewed by our team to determine if they violate our Terms of Service or Community Guidelines.




Paid advertising

PetitionOnline.ie will advertise this petition to 3,000 people.

Learn more...

Choose your budget
Payment method
PayPalGoogle PayApple PayCredit Card

Choose a payment method to continue.