Sacktheboard
Contact the author of the petition
Re:
#51: SemperFi - How can you be found guilty in a civil action?
Semantics Semper, the board failed to discharge their statutory obligations and were ruled against by Lord Trye.
Re:
#51: SemperFi - What has Easdale done to deserve the insults?
Who is insulting them ?
Sandy is a convicted fraudster, fact.
James was on the board that were ruled against by the Court of Session.
Both have a well deserved reputation in Inverclyde.
They are the latest front (with their own interests aswell) for the mysterious shareholders and friends who have been organising things. They came in to replace Green.
They made deals with Green prior to the IPO that in time may prove not to be squeaky clean.
They use Jack Irvine (as did the long cast of spivs to grace Ibrox) meanwhile there is absolute silence from them.
I could go on but people will start to get the picture.
Re:
#51: SemperFi - How is buying property squandering money?
The 14M loss in the accounts was seperate to one off figure of 4.2M which I believe included the property aquisitions.
The 5M costs in a 22M IPO is representative of how this board work, the 22M already having gone.
Re:
#51: SemperFi - How is a club with money in the bank and an overdraft facility in place approaching bankruptcy?
Who is providing the 2.5M unsecured loan ?
On what terms ?
Because other loans that have been provided to the club by the spivs have proved extremely expensive.
Do the arithmetic
With a 22M IPO, we post a 14M loss.
The unsecured overdraft facility is for 2.5M
Where is the investment coming from ?
Re:
#51: SemperFi - How are so many bluenoses reducing their argument to spivs out? Could it be that there is no other argument?
'Spivs Out' describes it very well.
James Easdale and Stockbridge off the board.
Sandy Easdale off the club board.
The new spiv appointments DS and NC can leave aswell with the new CEO up for debate.
There are many arguments as to why that be the case, perhaps you've been hibernating these past few years.
Subject
I.ve invested many many times less than the Easdales or Laxey. Therefore I have far more right than the 3Ms to have a voice in this club or even a valid opinion.
If you have invested fine persuade me I'm wrong. If you haven't fuck off
Re: Subject
#60: Choose a nickname - Subject If you have invested fine persuade me I'm wrong. If you haven't fuck off
The AGM will be settled by shareholders votes.
If major shareholders back X then he has just as much of a mandate of Y, who may actually own the same amount of shares.
This argument that you use is flawed, tired and doesn't hold weight.
The language you use to employ it is uncouth, confrontational and all too common for those who favour the sustainable spivline.
Support Murray,King who only want the best for our club
Re:
Paul Murrays' time has come and gone.King is the only choice now.
Re:
Do that and who would be left to move forward with? We need to pull in the same direction now.
Re:
Our club is being bled dry and we have cunts like you foaming at the nostrils over one guy who has fuck all to do with the bigger picture. Worse than a taig!
| This discussion has been closed. |
How can you be found guilty in a civil action?
What has Easdale done to deserve the insults?
How is buying property squandering money?
How is money spent on property turned into a loss? The property is still there.
How is a club with money in the bank and an overdraft facility in place approaching bankruptcy?
How are so many bluenoses reducing their argument to spivs out? Could it be that there is no other argument?